Texas cities come in several types, but two of the main ones are general law and home rule. Home rule cities in Texas have more authority and flexibility when it comes to local governance, while general law cities operate under stricter state regulations.
If the municipal officers in a general law city conclude that home rule would serve their constituents better and the city has more than 5,000 inhabitants, it is possible to change city type from a general law (Type A, B or C) system to a home rule system.
Here are five key factors Texas city officials should consider when making this decision:
Local control: One of the main benefits of becoming a home rule city is the ability to have more control over local governance. Home rule cities have the authority to enact ordinances, regulate land use, and address local issues in a way that general law cities cannot. City officials should consider whether they want more autonomy in decision-making and the ability to tailor policies to meet the needs of their community.
Flexibility: Home rule cities have the flexibility to adopt their own charter and organizational structure, which can be tailored to the specific needs and priorities of the city. This flexibility allows for more efficient and effective governance, as city officials can implement policies and programs that are best suited to their community. City officials should consider whether they want the freedom to adapt to changing circumstances and address local challenges in a more proactive manner.
Legal authority: Home rule cities have broader legal authority than general law cities, which allows them to address a wider range of issues and implement more comprehensive policies. City officials should consider whether they want the ability to regulate local businesses, address environmental concerns, or implement public safety measures that may be outside the scope of general law city regulations.
Public engagement: Switching to a home rule organization may require a change in the structure of local government, which could impact public engagement and representation. City officials should consider how the transition to home rule may affect the ability of residents to participate in decision-making processes and provide input on local issues. It is important to ensure that the new organizational structure promotes transparency, accountability, and accessibility to all community members.
Costs and resources: Transitioning to a home rule organization may require initial investments in updating organizational structures, training staff, and implementing new policies and procedures. City officials should consider the costs and resources associated with making this change and assess whether the benefits of becoming a home rule city outweigh the potential challenges.
It is important to consider the positions of all stakeholders and to get sound legal advice from local government attorney before making the decision to switch to home rule.
